Isn’t it about time we started calling the Civil Service and the Government to account for the repeated failures and wasted money in Public IT projects? Don’t delay! Sign the petition to the PM.
AGILE IN ACTION
Search Posts
-
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence
Recent Posts
- Pursuing features increases total cost of ownership
- Organization complexity is a waste farm
- Managing costs provides a false sense of security
- State of Agile survey for 2011 tells a familiar story
- (I can't get no) satisfaction, let alone customer delight
- Positive emotions and purpose
- People don't buy what you do, they buy why you do it
- Too busy chopping wood to sharpen the axe
- So you want a fresh apple
- Systems are seductive
Archives
- ► 2012 (6)
- ► 2011 (24)
-
▼
2010 (31)
- ► October (2)
- ► September (1)
- ► August (5)
- ► April (4)
- ► March (4)
- ▼ February (7)
- ► January (8)
- ► 2009 (41)
- ► 2008 (69)
- ► 2007 (152)
- ► 2006 (128)
- ► 2005 (63)
- ► 2004 (2)

2 Comments
There are four ways to spend money. 1) spending your own money on yourself - you care about quality and value for money, 2) spending your own money on someone else - you care about value but perhaps let quality slide a little, 3) spending somebody else's money on yourself - you care about quality but don't care if it's expensive, 4) spending somebody else's money on someone else - who cares what it costs or if it's any good.
All government spending comes under 4.
Interesting petition, but a bit vague. No CSFs to show if the petition has been actioned. i.e. someone could say: 'yes we've reviewed it', and not have to explain exactly why (what criteria they used & why) they reach the decision that the current system is 'just fine'.
One of the things is that all the projects are set up with requirements for huge financial security of the main contractor. That guarantees that the contractor will be one of the $2.5K per person companies, and also guarantees that they will try to spin it out.
You could suspect that the large firms have lobbied to make the entry criteria for an RFI favour them.
A more concrete petition would ask for a review of both public & private projects to see if the measures (e.g. financial size of firm) have helped the projects either in terms of a) on time/budget delivery, b) recovery of costs in the event of a failure.
Secondly in line with the agile manifesto.. a similar comparison could be made for agile vs. BDUF projects.