On the
Agile Forums ,
Brian Marick said "a lot of people think the
Agile Alliance is irrelevant". What do you
think?
The poll is anonymous. And if you're working with agile methods
your opinion is important so please don't leave without voting. And
please share this poll with your colleagues.
Simply click 'yes' or 'no'.
Monday, 18 June 2007
Is the Agile Alliance irrelevant?
Posted by Simon Baker - Permalink
3 Comments
This should produce an interesting result if we can get a representative cross section, Simon.
However we must bear in mind that a negative result should not be viewed as a failure of the AA - IMNSHO the Alliance did much to raise awareness of what "agile" is, and so its initial format was valuable (it certainly got my attention). However now that we have the bandwagon effect kicking in it needs to evolve in order to maintain the value of the term "agile".
I do not believe that is irrelevant. But it would certainly be useful for it to become "lot more relevant".
Its become a bit historical much like the old fellas who drafted the american constitution. Theyve created a lasting legacy.. its time for the AA to move on