A short while ago I said that
fixed-price contracts don't work
. Over on the
Scrum Development group there's a
discussion about
competitiveness, estimates and
organization culture .
Dave Martin said:
People underbid because it gets them the initial contract as
many clients will just go for the lowest bid. Once the project is
underway, the costs start to escalate and the client has 2 options
- pay up or write the project off and start again. The client is
often better off writing off their initial investment and starting
over but its amazing how often they don't do that and continue to
burn money.
Keith Sterling responded:
This is why so many large consultancies stick to the
waterfall method. By bidding low and stipulating a waterfall
approach, yet knowing that 99.99% of all projects will undergo
25-35% change during its lifetime, they know they will be able to
make up the shortfall in their bid with high value change requests.
It's a well known fact, yet unwritten rule that most large
consultancies in the UK base their business model on the volume of
change requests they can generate during a project, and why most of
these organisations have some of the biggest legal departments I
have ever seen.
Where is the sense in awarding business based solely on the price?
Price is meaningless without a measure of the quality being
purchased. If clients award business to the lowest bidder they're
likely to receive low quality and high cost. You get what you pay
for. And the client-vendor relationship will become acrimonious as
neither party is satisified and it falls to the lawyers to fight it
out.
Deming predicated that
driving down the price without regard to quality and service
will drive good vendors and good service out of business .
He was right but it's actually worse. As Keith describes, we now
see companies making money from providing poor quality by charging
extortionate sums for change requests. It's part of their business
models. What a truly sad state of affairs.
Wouldn't it be better to enter into and nurture cooperative
partnerships for the long-term that are built on mutual loyalty,
trust and confidence, and which share the risks and the rewards? If
you treat your partners as extensions to your business and align
incentives so that everybody works for the good of the partnership,
then quality will return, cost will fall, speed of delivery will
increase, customers will be happy and everyone will realise
prosperity.
Wednesday, 16 May 2007
How did it get to be so wrong?
Posted by Simon Baker - Permalink